Yes, the removal of RISC-V from LLVM_ALL_TARGETS was intentional. See https://reviews.llvm.org/D36538 and the accompanying message to llvm-dev: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-August/116347.html for the rationale.
Thanks, Simon ________________________________________ From: Release-testers [release-testers-boun...@lists.llvm.org] on behalf of Bero Rosenkränzer via Release-testers [release-test...@lists.llvm.org] Sent: 26 August 2017 13:00 To: Hans Wennborg Cc: llvm-dev; Release-testers; cfe-dev; openmp-dev (openmp-...@lists.llvm.org); LLDB Dev Subject: Re: [Release-testers] [5.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 3 tagged Working well here so far. Is the removal of the RISCVCodeGen, RISCVDesc and RISCVInfo libraries that were in rc2 intentional? ttyl bero On 26 August 2017 at 00:52, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <release-test...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Dear testers, > > 5.0.0-rc3 was just tagged. > > This is a release candidate in the real sense: if nothing bad comes up > in testing, this is what the release is going to look like. > > Please build, test and upload binaries to the sftp (use the > /data/testers-uploads/ directory) and let me know what issues remain. > > I know we're a little bit behind schedule, but hopefully we can get to > 'final' soon. > > Cheers, > Hans > _______________________________________________ > Release-testers mailing list > release-test...@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers _______________________________________________ Release-testers mailing list release-test...@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
