It would be better if the build fails hard if some dependency isn't
available. I'll never notice a message about Python support being
disabled since there's so much noise in the build anyway.

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Ted Woodward
<ted.woodw...@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> LLDBConfig.cmake has this:
>
>
>
>   if (NOT (PYTHON_DEBUG_EXE AND PYTHON_RELEASE_EXE AND PYTHON_DEBUG_LIB AND
> PYTHON_RELEASE_LIB AND PYTHON_DEBUG_DLL AND PYTHON_RELEASE_DLL))
>
>     message("Python installation is corrupt. Python support will be disabled
> for this build.")
>
>     set(LLDB_DISABLE_PYTHON 1 PARENT_SCOPE)
>
>     return()
>
>   endif()
>
>
>
> Internally I’ve changed it to:
>
>
>
>   if (CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE STREQUAL "Debug")
>
>     if (NOT (PYTHON_DEBUG_EXE AND PYTHON_DEBUG_LIB AND PYTHON_DEBUG_DLL))
>
>       message("Python installation is corrupt. Python support will be
> disabled for this build.")
>
>       set(LLDB_DISABLE_PYTHON 1 PARENT_SCOPE)
>
>       return()
>
>     endif()
>
>   else()
>
>     if (NOT (PYTHON_RELEASE_EXE AND PYTHON_RELEASE_LIB))
>
>       message("Python installation is corrupt. Python support will be
> disabled for this build.")
>
>       set(LLDB_DISABLE_PYTHON 1 PARENT_SCOPE)
>
>       return()
>
>     endif()
>
>   endif()
>
>
>
> That works with our buildbots building release.
>
>
>
> Note the release check doesn’t check for the DLL – our installations don’t
> have the release DLL, so I didn’t put that in.
>
>
>
> I can push this change upstream if you’d like, Zach.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
>
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a
> Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
>
>
> From: lldb-dev [mailto:lldb-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Zachary
> Turner via lldb-dev
> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 3:18 PM
> To: Vadim Chugunov <vadi...@gmail.com>; Hans Wennborg <h...@chromium.org>;
> LLDB <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>
> Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] Python scripting in Windows LLDB
>
>
>
> Hmm, I believe it's only supposed to do that if you're doing a debug build.
> It should only require the Python libraries that match your current build.
> Is it not doing this?
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 1:15 PM Vadim Chugunov via lldb-dev
> <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Update: looks like Python detection in CMake now requires debug binaries to
> be there as well (e.g. python35_d.dll), otherwise Python support gets
> disabled.  I am wondering if Python the build machine was installed without
> the debug stuff.
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Vadim Chugunov <vadi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>
>
> I've just noticed that LLDB from the most recent LLVM Windows snapshot build
> has Python scripting disabled.
>
> Was this done on purpose and for what reason if so?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

Reply via email to