> On Feb 21, 2017, at 4:49 PM, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev > <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > >> On Feb 21, 2017, at 4:24 PM, Greg Clayton via lldb-dev >> <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> - StepOverBreakpointTestCase: Have the test not store the breakpoints >>> in the test case object. Basically, declare that this is not a bug, >>> and it's the users responsibility to clean up necessary objects. >> >> It would be nice to avoid this. >> >>> > > I don't agree with this. I think trying to force folks using the API from > Python to manually clear all stored objects would be really obnoxious. If > anything, we should figure out how to make this accidental failure into an > intended failure so we can make sure we don't end up requiring this kind of > micro-management.
It's possible you meant "it would be nice to avoid it's being the user's responsibility to clean up necessary objects", in which case sorry for mis-reading but happy we agree... Jim > > Jim > > > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
