I was thinking the same thing too. I figured this was just for the interim.
Chris, did you mean to update the global LLVM style conventions? On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:27 AM Jim Ingham <jing...@apple.com> wrote: > Shouldn't this be made general and added to the llvm coding conventions? > I was assuming that upon completion of this exercise, we would delete the > lldb coding conventions doc. > > Jim > > > On Aug 11, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev < > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:37 PM Chris Lattner <clatt...@apple.com> > wrote: > > > >> On Aug 9, 2016, at 3:01 PM, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev < > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> > >> So perhaps it would be reasonable for us to standardize on something > like this: > >> > >> • Main Module Header > >> • Local/Private Headers > >> • lldb/... > >> • llvm/... > >> • System #includes > > > > This makes sense to me, and matches what clang does as well. I think > that this is clearly in the spirit of the llvm include order standards, and > I think it would be great to make this explicit in the coding standard > doc. Can you send in a patch to update it to make this explicit? I’ll > review it. > > > > -Chris > > > > I actually just submitted the patch. (Sorry, itchy trigger finger or > something). r278373. If you have any comments let me know and I'm happy > to iterate on it. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lldb-dev mailing list > > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
