> -----Original Message----- > From: Renato Golin [mailto:renato.go...@linaro.org] > Sent: Friday, July 01, 2016 2:52 PM > To: Daniel Berlin > Cc: Robinson, Paul; llvm-dev; LLDB; cfe-...@lists.llvm.org; openmp-dev > (openmp-...@lists.llvm.org); Rafael Espíndola > Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] FYI: Landing the initial > draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct > > On 1 July 2016 at 18:32, Daniel Berlin via lldb-dev > <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> The single word "rare" in the current code doesn't feel like enough. > > > > I don't actually disagree with your criticism, IMHO, i just don't know > of a > > way to generate more clarity. > > Paul, Rafael, Daniel, > > With the intention of being pragmatic and getting the draft out > (remember, it's *still* a draft), would having Daniel's new proposal > more comfortable? > > "In addition, violations of this code outside these spaces may, in > rare cases, affect a person's ability to participate within them, when > the conduct amounts to an egregious violation of the community's > social standard."
Daniel claimed it was not different, even though he proposed the text. I think it is better, as "egregious" (even though it is qualitative) helps identify what "rare" circumstances would come under the policy. As a non-lawyer I do think it's different. Yes I would be happier with that added, although it might not be enough for everyone who is unhappy with the code as-is. Thanks, --paulr > > If so, than I'd hope we could get this through and start discussing > the second part, the reporting and committee formation, which I think > it's much more important than the code itself. > > cheers, > --renato _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
