+1.
On 06/30/2016 04:01 PM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Aaron Ballman via cfe-dev" <cfe-...@lists.llvm.org>
To: "Chandler Carruth" <chandl...@gmail.com>
Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>, "cfe-dev" <cfe-...@lists.llvm.org>,
"openmp-dev
(openmp-...@lists.llvm.org)" <openmp-...@lists.llvm.org>, "LLDB"
<lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 5:34:13 PM
Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of
Conduct
Thank you for your continuing efforts on the Code of Conduct! I
appreciate the efforts and strongly support this direction.
~Aaron
+1
-Hal
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Chandler Carruth via cfe-dev
<cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
Hello folks,
As mentioned some time ago[1], we’ve had a long (looooooong) series
of
discussions about establishing a code-of-conduct for the LLVM
project as a
whole over on the llvm-dev thread and the
http://reviews.llvm.org/D13741
code review.
The discussion has largely died down for some time, and towards the
end
there has been pretty wide support for the draft wording we have
now. It
isn’t perfect, and there are still some important questions around
forming
the advisory committee to handle reporting, but I think the wording
is at a
good point of compromise in a challenging area.
Based on the support, I’m going to land the patch that adds the
draft. I’m
hoping this will immediately provide good advice and guidance, and
I’m
hoping to see motion on setting up a reasonable advisory committee
and
resolving any issues around reporting so we can make this an
official part
of the community.
I sending this as a heads up so folks are aware, not to start a new
discussion thread. There are existing discussion threads[2] on
llvm-dev if
folks want to join in active discussion or we can start fresh ones,
but I
would encourage people to carefully read the discussion that has
already
taken place to avoid revisiting areas that have already been
heavily
discussed.
Also, many thanks to the folks who provided all their opinions on
the
mailing list threads and in person in long discussions about this
topic.
Thanks,
-Chandler
[1]: Prior announcements:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-October/091218.html
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-October/045460.html
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2015-October/008530.html
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/openmp-dev/2015-October/000954.html
[2]: Existing threads:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-October/091218.html
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-May/099120.html
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151019/307070.html
_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
cfe-...@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
cfe-...@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev