> On Jun 28, 2016, at 1:55 AM, NAKAMURA Takumi via llvm-dev > <llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > It has also submodules. > https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project-submodule > <https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project-submodule> > > Both llvm-project(-tree) and (-submodule) have refs/notes/commits.
This is easy to compute when coming from SVN, the difficulty will be to keep this when having multiple git repo as a source. — Mehid > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:13 AM Renato Golin via llvm-dev > <llvm-...@lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > On 27 June 2016 at 17:03, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espind...@gmail.com > <mailto:rafael.espind...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I think that trying to create a ordering/rev number between independent git > > repositories is fundamentally unreliable. > > > > If we want to keep llvm and clang in lock step we should probably probably > > just have them in the same repository like > > https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project > > <https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project>. > > That is similar to the proposal we have, except that llvm-projects > will have sub-modules. > > Having all of them in the same physical repository is a big problems > for those that only use a small subset of the components, which is the > vast majority of users, most of the time (all buildbots, Jenkins, > local development, downstream users, even releases don't clone all > repos). > > cheers, > --renato > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-...@lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev> > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-...@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
