On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Chris Lattner <clatt...@apple.com> wrote: > On Jun 27, 2016, at 8:26 AM, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev > <llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> That's what concerns me about going to the scheme Richard and Rafael >> suggested, of bumping the major version each time: we'd release 4.0, >> and would Tom's dot-release then be 4.1? That would be confusing to >> those who are used to our current scheme. Chris suggested going >> straight to 40 to avoid this, but that also seems a bit extreme. > > Extreme how? What do you mean by “extreme"?
Sorry, that might have been a poor choice of wording. I just meant that change seems to have a much greater magnitude than the other proposals. I realize that's sort of the point, to make the change clear to users, but instinctively it feels wrong -- like cheating by skipping 36 versions :-) Thanks, Hans _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
