On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev
<llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Richard suggested that since we do time-based rather than
> feature-based releases, the distinction between a release with or
> without major changes is arbitrary, and we should move to a scheme
> where we update the major version number on each release (4.0, 5.0,
> etc.) with minor releases in between (4.1, 5.1, ..).
If we are truly committed to doing time-based releases, we can switch
to time-based version numbers, Year.Month, for example, if we were to
release in June it would be 16.06. We can use an extra digit for
minor releases.
Dmitri
--
main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
(j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <griboz...@gmail.com>*/
_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
