On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Tim Northover via llvm-dev < llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On 31 May 2016 at 12:31, Renato Golin via cfe-dev > <cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > What do people think? Any issue not covered that we should? > > I'm in favour of the move. Git-svn just about works most of the time, > but I find it makes committing to release branches particularly > painful. It also randomly corrupts its database occasionally, just for > the giggles I assume. > I get hit by that every so often :-(. As others have mentioned, the monotonically incrementing ids are extremely useful, particularly when bisecting across clang/llvm. I think that Medhi's suggestion may be a viable solution. As long as a mechanism for bisecting across the repositories is worked out, definitely a +1 from me. > Tim. > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-...@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > -- Saleem Abdulrasool compnerd (at) compnerd (dot) org
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
