-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 08.12.2015 17:21, Ed Maste wrote: > On 7 December 2015 at 19:28, Kamil Rytarowski via lldb-dev > <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> I ran the LLDB test suite of the LLDB-current version on >> NetBSD/amd64 (v. 7.99.21). >> >> The results are as follows: >> >> 415 out of 415 test suites processed - TestRecursiveTypes.py >> >> Ran 415 test suites (266 failed) (64.096386%) Ran 222 test cases >> (145 failed) (65.315315%) Failing Tests (266) >> >> The major missing piece is native process tracking support (with >> the ptrace(2) interface). Once added, LLDB should start to be >> usable on this platform. > > Great progress, and thanks for the update! Are you planning to > base the NetBSD native support on NativeProcessLinux? I need to > migrate the FreeBSD support to work that way still. >
In my initial scratch (before upstreaming of the current NetBSD support) I cloned the current FreeBSD approach. It was halfbaked, building and not working. I will see the NativeProcessLinux way. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWaJMmAAoJEEuzCOmwLnZs9PEP/ieCtuUqDE+G9hDm3sk4u4I+ 83aMdtOzWFO4I26MLRjqKqytn5iEgltWuLT0VW47IU/hynkEOET8m3cwTLkIakGC pBohk16yl6dQo97rU3/dVlLuKpkuN1wk19/IRxbqVSV8m86IFAPI1T8xQCWXa9iT 6dTRli4pW0OemlBxvWXM0tRm7d2GISgkAlGbHkZ3grfQYufJ8ulZyGDI+5Kss0oV Ku0ovL9U+vtyLdHlcpimuTaMvMZThnv3eJdImGlwXJrvS4yZifP2PiyM3qGXxiqb 0ZzBT9Gb8fqVoVOD9Al95NycIHu/jptudt+3YJoeMN903eQz6wT7izZm055MpEfu HPKvrbpeQyOZ2j7Z8xbqlNl0vm0Q2c41/LaoneMOcf6Uu7XZ/5yaKT+j2oGT6O4m vRZ3pfyZqlTMtlUxs6+HfFT08AfW1cRqmpNInw/fkQVtmmIkytmOELF/fpsks8XC cXF3XQtFRGmbDyvGZdeKwXO55qCyL9w3BbhMTrIopm+sPaayB4OcGnV00++3mwJn Y3iUXTb5Xrqm1ORFUaXmaoDdiSSSHhAZRmS+VgqJ4/+AWWiWcGbZd2oKIg3b+FmO yu1DIeFsmWnaFNkp+cjnjr049ofO8kUbr6dCIJ6EyiydRWwXLufiKZhpYmpT48i1 kenLjLCuVTYFjkzM8HXA =0zUx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
