Can --results-file=stdout be the default so that we don't have to specify that?
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:02 AM Todd Fiala via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Also, all the text in the summary is fixed-width lined up nicely, which > may not show in the commit message description if you're using a > variable-width font. On a terminal it looks nice. > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Todd Fiala <todd.fi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Todd Fiala <todd.fi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I just put up an optional test results formatter that is a prototype of >>> what we may move towards for our default test summary results. It went in >>> here: >>> >>> r254530 >>> >>> and you can try it out with something like: >>> >>> time test/dotest.py --executable `pwd`/build/Debug/lldb >>> --results-formatter >>> lldbsuite.test.basic_results_formatter.BasicResultsFormatter --results-file >>> st >>> out >>> >>> >> I cut and paste my line, but more than likely for most people you'd just >> want this: >> >> test/dotest.py --results-formatter >> lldbsuite.test.basic_results_formatter.BasicResultsFormatter --results-file >> stdout >> >> The other stuff was specific to my setup. That line assumes you run from >> the lldb source dir root. >> >> >> Let me know if this satisfies the basic needs of counts and whatnot. It >>> counts test method runs rather than all the oddball "file, class, etc." >>> counts we had before. >>> >>> It prints out the Details section when there are details, and keeps it >>> nice and clean when there are none. >>> >>> It also mentions a bit about test reruns up top, but that won't come >>> into play until I get the multi-test-pass, single-worker/low-load mechanism >>> in place, which will depend on newer rerun count awareness support. >>> >>> The change also cleans up places where the test event framework was >>> using string codes and replaces them with symbolic constants. >>> >>> Let me know what you think. I can tweak it as needed to address testbot >>> and other needs. Once it looks reasonable, I'd like to move over to using >>> it by default in the parallel test runner rather than the legacy support. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> -- >>> -Todd >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> -Todd >> > > > > -- > -Todd > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
