I am fine with case "a". Greg
> On Sep 28, 2015, at 2:48 AM, Pavel Labath <lab...@google.com> wrote: > > Hello all, > > The following question came up while fixing up handling of process detach. > > when detaching from a running process, on some platforms LLDB needs to > stop it first. Is this stop something that should be hidden from the > public view or not? > > I.e. if the process state is Running, and I do a process.Detach(), > what is the correct sequence of public state transitions one should > observe: > a) Running -> Detached ? > > b) (Running -> Stopped -> Detached) or (Running -> Detached), > depending on whether the platform performs the maintenance stop? > > My feeling is it should be a), but I wanted to double check first. > > pl _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
