Okay! On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the heads up, I'm familiar with the flag. I'll look into > whether it's appropriate when I get back from CppCon > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 8:44 AM Todd Fiala <todd.fi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hey Zachary, >> >> There is a Windows-specific subprocess.CREATE_NEW_PROCESS_GROUP flag that >> you could potentially add to the Windows branch of the suprocess creation >> call in dosep.py. I'm not sure how useful that is on the Windows end as >> this is mostly about console signal isolation, but I thought I'd call it >> out in case you were interested in adding that to the Windows inferior >> dotest.py creation. >> >> -Todd >> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Todd Fiala <todd.fi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> tfiala committed rL248282: test runner: Unix systems now put inferior >>> dotest in its own process group.. >>> >>> test runner: Unix systems now put inferior dotest in its own process >>> group. >>> >>> This increases isolation as it relates to signal handling between parent >>> and >>> children. >>> >>> >>> Files: >>> /lldb/trunk/test/dosep.py >>> >>> Users: >>> tfiala (Author) >>> >>> http://reviews.llvm.org/rL248282 >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> -Todd >> > -- -Todd
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
