My bad, there are actually a bunch of vAttach variant packets we added to support attaching by process name, and "wait for a process to show up and then attach to it" and the like.
I added documentation for them. Jim On May 9, 2014, at 8:57 AM, Todd Fiala <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Matthew, > > Essentially you'll want to return a string like this: > $OK#9a > > if your gdb remote debug monitor can handle that (undocumented) element, or > return this: > $#00 > > if you do not support the packet. > > I've been digging into the protocol lately since I'm adding tests for gdb > remote protocol-layer activity, so that I can verify lldb-gdbserver (llgs) on > Linux is acting identically to debugserver on MacOSX (and to make it easier > for us to transition from debugserver to llgs). > > I had noted that packet wasn't documented a while back. When I get to > testing that one, I'll update the doc text file on it. > > > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Abid, Hafiz <[email protected]> wrote: > I have not read the documentation for this packet. But looking at the code, > It seems that you will return OK if your stub supports this packet. Otherwise > an empty reply can > Indicate that packet is not supported. > > Please look at the following link for more details about query packets. > https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/General-Query-Packets.html#General-Query-Packets > > Thanks, > Abid > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Matthew Gardiner [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: 09 May 2014 13:24 > > To: Abid, Hafiz; [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] GDB RSP qVAttachOrWaitSupported > > > > Abid, Hafiz wrote: > > > RNBRemote::HandlePacket_qVAttachOrWaitSupported has the following > > comments which may give you some idea. > > > // We support attachOrWait meaning attach if the process exists, > > otherwise wait to attach. > > Ok, thanks. > > > > So this whole entity "VAttachOrWaitSupported" is a concept which the stub > > does or not support, correct? > > > > If so, does the stub write back "1", if it does support it, otherwise "0"? > > > > Presumably if the stub does support this feature, are there any other > > messages which the stub should then support? > > > > I'm still not really clear what's happening here.... > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > Member of the CSR plc group of companies. CSR plc registered in England > > and Wales, registered number 4187346, registered office Churchill House, > > Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, United > > Kingdom More information can be found at www.csr.com. Keep up to date > > with CSR on our technical blog, www.csr.com/blog, CSR people blog, > > www.csr.com/people, YouTube, www.youtube.com/user/CSRplc, Facebook, > > www.facebook.com/pages/CSR/191038434253534, or follow us on Twitter at > > www.twitter.com/CSR_plc. > > New for 2014, you can now access the wide range of products powered by > > aptX at www.aptx.com. > > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > > > > -- > -Todd > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
