Hi Todd, > From my end it looks like the arm64 part should be aarch64 (?), but the > other failures around CPU_TYPE_ARM64 was less clear what to do.
The situation's in flux, but at the moment both ARM64 and AArch64 exist in ToT. If I had to guess at your errors, I'd say you hadn't updated the llvm tree in a while so it's out of sync with lldb. Certainly CPU_TYPE_ARM is no longer defined on line 914 of MachO.h. So have you updated llvm (& clang)? Cheers. Tim. _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
