On 24 November 2013 06:15, Sylvestre Ledru <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am working on the port of lldb on the various Debian architectures
> [1].
The kFreeBSD-amd64 failure there is a missing
lldb_private::Host::LaunchProcess. Is testing for __GLIBC__ as well
reasonable?
diff --git a/source/Host/common/Host.cpp b/source/Host/common/Host.cpp
index d812ae0..787d165 100644
--- a/source/Host/common/Host.cpp
+++ b/source/Host/common/Host.cpp
@@ -1569,7 +1569,7 @@ Host::RunShellCommand (const char *command,
return error;
}
-#if defined(__linux__) or defined(__FreeBSD__)
+#if defined(__linux__) || defined(__FreeBSD__) || defined(__GLIBC__)
// The functions below implement process launching via posix_spawn() for Linux
// and FreeBSD.
_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
