================
@@ -1376,6 +1382,16 @@ void request_evaluate(const llvm::json::Object &request)
{
EmplaceSafeString(body, "result", result);
body.try_emplace("variablesReference", (int64_t)0);
} else {
+ if (context == "repl") {
+ // If the expression is empty and the last expression was for a
+ // variable, set the expression to the previous expression (repeat the
+ // evaluation); otherwise save the current non-empty expression for the
+ // next (possibly empty) variable expression.
+ if (expression.empty())
+ expression = g_dap.last_nonempty_var_expression;
----------------
walter-erquinigo wrote:
IIUC, this has the following flow in the debug console:
- You send a command (non-var expression) FOO
- You send a var expression VAR
- You send empty text -> then FOO repeats
If that understanding is correct, that would lead to a confusing behavior. I
think it's better to repeat only if the previous input was exactly a command.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107485
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
