================
@@ -645,6 +645,33 @@ lldb::SBValue SBValue::CreateValueFromData(const char
*name, SBData data,
return sb_value;
}
+lldb::SBValue SBValue::CreateBoolValue(const char *name, bool value) {
+ LLDB_INSTRUMENT_VA(this, name);
+
+ lldb::SBValue sb_value;
+ lldb::ValueObjectSP new_value_sp;
+ ValueLocker locker;
+ lldb::ValueObjectSP value_sp(GetSP(locker));
+ ProcessSP process_sp = m_opaque_sp->GetProcessSP();
+ lldb::SBTarget target = GetTarget();
+ if (!target.IsValid())
+ return sb_value;
+ lldb::SBType boolean_type = target.GetBasicType(lldb::eBasicTypeBool);
+ lldb::TypeImplSP type_impl_sp(boolean_type.GetSP());
+ if (value_sp && process_sp && type_impl_sp) {
+ int data_buf[1] = {value ? 1 : 0};
----------------
Jlalond wrote:
Is a data buffer the only option here because of the bitwise logic? I ask
because we could just have the address point to a singular byte instead right?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108414
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
