https://github.com/Jlalond created 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108248

@adrian-prantl from your recent changes I keep encountering issues iwth this 
file in my build chain. Does this API usage look correct for your new redesign?

>From 0b449cc60c33ee8231c7a108511207298fab0403 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacob Lalonde <jalalo...@fb.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:46:02 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Remove CommandObjectTraceStartIntelPT.cpp call to Status()
 constructed and instead move err

---
 .../Plugins/Trace/intel-pt/CommandObjectTraceStartIntelPT.cpp | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git 
a/lldb/source/Plugins/Trace/intel-pt/CommandObjectTraceStartIntelPT.cpp 
b/lldb/source/Plugins/Trace/intel-pt/CommandObjectTraceStartIntelPT.cpp
index 81f7c228561a6d..ea28c3251d7472 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Plugins/Trace/intel-pt/CommandObjectTraceStartIntelPT.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/Plugins/Trace/intel-pt/CommandObjectTraceStartIntelPT.cpp
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ bool CommandObjectThreadTraceStartIntelPT::DoExecuteOnThreads(
     llvm::ArrayRef<lldb::tid_t> tids) {
   if (Error err = m_trace.Start(tids, m_options.m_ipt_trace_size,
                                 m_options.m_enable_tsc, 
m_options.m_psb_period))
-    result.SetError(Status(std::move(err)));
+    result.SetError(std::move(err));
   else
     result.SetStatus(eReturnStatusSuccessFinishResult);
 
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ void CommandObjectProcessTraceStartIntelPT::DoExecute(
           m_options.m_ipt_trace_size, m_options.m_process_buffer_size_limit,
           m_options.m_enable_tsc, m_options.m_psb_period,
           m_options.m_per_cpu_tracing, m_options.m_disable_cgroup_filtering))
-    result.SetError(Status(std::move(err)));
+    result.SetError(std::move(err));
   else
     result.SetStatus(eReturnStatusSuccessFinishResult);
 }

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to