omjavaid wrote: > Seems ok to me. > > If I had to guess, I'd say that the initial stop problem is due to us > stopping the process "too early" (i.e., in a state where it's not yet fully > initialized and ready to accept debugger commands). Maybe there's a different > way to stop the process at the first instruction?
Yes I think there might be a Windows API launch flag that can let us do early detection of hardware breakpoints and watchpoints. But so far after lots of experimentation I have not been able to find the right set. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108072 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
