felipepiovezan wrote:

> @felipepiovezan Are you OK if we push this as-is, or would you like smarter 
> logic for detecting libc++ on the system?

I'm fine with this; in hindsight, I think the original workaround was not good 
enough.

The longer term fix would be set both "use system std library" "use libcxx" and 
skip the test if it's impossible to satisfy both requirements at the same time. 
But we can do that later if this becomes a problem.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106885
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to