slydiman wrote:
@labath
> Basically, keep the socket code inside the socket class, but make it
> asynchronous. This way you can listen for as many sockets (and other things)
> as you like. It shouldn't be necessary to do the socket handling stuff
> externally.
>
> I haven't looked into exactly how this would fit into the Acceptor class in
> lldb-server, but my preferred solutions would be:
>
> * delete it (or at least significantly slim down it's functionality -- it's a
> very thin wrapper over the Socket class, and probably only exists due to
> historic reasons)
> * make it callback-based as well
>
> I don't like the idea of making Acceptor responsible for multiple ports for
> the same reason I did not want to do that for TCPSocket -- it's complicated
> and inflexible.
I don't see any profit of this change. Using an extrernal MainLoop we can break
the blocking Accept() from an other thread. But we can break it making a dummy
connection too.
The main reason to change TCPSocket was to be able to wait for multiple
connections from different ports in the same blocking Accept() in the single
thread.
Currently #104238 contains the best implementation of Acceptor.cpp w/o changing
TCPSocket.
sock_cb parameter is useles here because it will be always the same.
TCPSocket::m_listen_sockets is still here and it is still inaccesible
externally. The method Listen() which initializes m_listen_sockets is
unchanged.
A callback may be useful (in theory) in Listen() to add a custom listen sockets
to m_listen_sockets. Probably it is better to just initialize an own
listen_sockets and just provide it to TCPSocket. But where this code will be
placed? Acceptor.cpp, lldb-platform.cpp?
If you want to delete Acceptor, the best approach is the following:
Use Listen() from #104797 but w/o changing the connection string:
Status TCPSocket::Listen(llvm::StringRef name, int backlog, std::set<uint16_t>
* extra_ports = nullptr)
The accept MainLoop must be a member of TCPSocket and it is enough to just add
TCPSocket::BreakAccept() { m_accept_loop.AddPendingCallback([](MainLoopBase
&loop) { loop.RequestTermination(); }); }
> I haven't looked into exactly how this would fit into the Acceptor class in
> lldb-server
This is the problem. I don't see how this PR will help to implement accepting
for multiple connections from 2 ports. It only complicates TCPSocket.
I'm trying to offer the `completed` solution which has been tested.
BTW, please approve NFC #106640.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106955
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
