================
@@ -788,7 +808,10 @@ Type::GetTypeScopeAndBasename(llvm::StringRef name) {
     switch (pos.value()) {
     case ':':
       if (prev_is_colon && template_depth == 0) {
-        result.scope.push_back(name.slice(name_begin, pos.index() - 1));
+        llvm::StringRef scope_name = name.slice(name_begin, pos.index() - 1);
----------------
labath wrote:

> Do I understand correctly that we could've kept this as-is, but would then 
> have to check for the (anonymous namespace) string in the ContextMatches 
> function?

That's correct, except that we would need to check for this string and still 
also the empty string (as that's how it comes out of DWARF). I figured its best 
to standardize this as early as possible (and an empty string seems like a less 
language-specific version).

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102111
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to