mizvekov wrote: One possibility here is that if you have the type, then you will have a template specialization type for the template alias, and that gives you the template arguments used to specialize the alias. Which should answer this need.
But of course, if you have a lossy semantic adjustment which makes you lose top level sugar, then you might not have the template specialization type anymore, but this will also apply to Subst* nodes, which can also be lost in these cases. But you might have noticed already that type sugar cannot be reliably depended upon. @zygoloid thoughts? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101858 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
