labath wrote: > > The field this is consuming is actually 17 bytes long, because the process > > name is in parenthesis. > > Ok then I am confused how this ever worked, but it sounds like scanf was > never a great way to do this anyway?
The field it's overwriting is in a struct, so it has a lot of headroom for "safely" overflowing without hitting anything important. And since the the other fields are parsed after the string field, they probably just immediately overwrite the corrupted data. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94783 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
