================
@@ -3264,6 +3266,11 @@ Status Process::PrivateResume() {
// filters before resuming.
UpdateAutomaticSignalFiltering();
+ if (m_last_run_direction != direction) {
----------------
rocallahan wrote:
If the user does "continue", hits a breakpoint, does "reverse-step", and then
"reverse-continue" presumably we do have to abandon the original "continue".
Since this patch only implements "reverse-continue" maybe always abandoning the
thread plans actually the right thing to do for now?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99736
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
