dlav-sc wrote: > > Thanks for the patches (if we end up going down this route you'll probably > > want to split out the LLVM JIT changes into a separate PR). > > I know little about the JIT side but this is my first reaction too. I wonder > if that has its own tests that need adding, and it'll get more expert eyes on > it. > > > without RISCV large code model, which has not been implemented yet > > I presume the work to do this is much greater than the work shown here?
To be fair I'm not sure. We have this MR: https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/pull/388#issuecomment-1737115297 . This review is taking quite a while already. So I presume there are some issue there. On the hand we can always disable the suggested path if needed. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99336 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
