labath wrote: I'd like to note that, at least in the ELF world, there's no guarantee that there will be an actual *symbol* at the address where the process starts executing. The convention is to call this `_start` but nothing in the system actually relies on that. The ELF header contains the address of the first instruction, the OS jumps to that, and that's it.
So, I think that a more generic interface would be to return an `Address` (which the caller can try to resolve to a symbol if it wants to). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99673 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits