================
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+#include "lldb/Target/VerboseTrapFrameRecognizer.h"
+
+#include "lldb/Core/Module.h"
+#include "lldb/Symbol/Function.h"
+#include "lldb/Symbol/SymbolContext.h"
+#include "lldb/Target/Process.h"
+#include "lldb/Target/StackFrameRecognizer.h"
+#include "lldb/Target/Target.h"
+
+#include "lldb/Utility/LLDBLog.h"
+#include "lldb/Utility/Log.h"
+
+#include "clang/CodeGen/ModuleBuilder.h"
+
+using namespace llvm;
+using namespace lldb;
+using namespace lldb_private;
+
+VerboseTrapRecognizedStackFrame::VerboseTrapRecognizedStackFrame(
+    StackFrameSP most_relevant_frame_sp, std::string stop_desc)
+    : m_most_relevant_frame(most_relevant_frame_sp) {
+  m_stop_desc = std::move(stop_desc);
+}
+
+lldb::RecognizedStackFrameSP
+VerboseTrapFrameRecognizer::RecognizeFrame(lldb::StackFrameSP frame_sp) {
+  if (frame_sp->GetFrameIndex())
+    return {};
+
+  ThreadSP thread_sp = frame_sp->GetThread();
+  ProcessSP process_sp = thread_sp->GetProcess();
+
+  StackFrameSP most_relevant_frame_sp = thread_sp->GetStackFrameAtIndex(1);
----------------
Michael137 wrote:

While I don't see it documented explicitly, `GetStackFrameAtIndex` handles 
cases where we asked for a frame index that's out-of-bounds. And according to 
the docs `GetStackFrameCount` can be expensive to check, so we probably don't 
want to do that here

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80368
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to