kendalharland wrote: > This should be fine, although looking at the test case again, I think that > even simply replacing process.GetThreadAtIndex(0) with self.thread() should > be enough. self.thread() returns the "selected" thread and lldb should always > be selecting the thread which has stopped "for a reason" (e.g. a breakpoint) > and not a random (or first) thread in the process.
This also works. Agreed it's much better. Ty for the suggestion! Updated. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96685 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
