================
@@ -46,75 +46,116 @@ lldb::ValueObjectSP
ValueObjectConstResultImpl::Dereference(Status &error) {
return m_impl_backend->ValueObject::Dereference(error);
}
-ValueObject *ValueObjectConstResultImpl::CreateChildAtIndex(
- size_t idx, bool synthetic_array_member, int32_t synthetic_index) {
+ValueObject *ValueObjectConstResultImpl::CreateChildAtIndex(size_t idx) {
if (m_impl_backend == nullptr)
return nullptr;
m_impl_backend->UpdateValueIfNeeded(false);
- ValueObjectConstResultChild *valobj = nullptr;
-
bool omit_empty_base_classes = true;
- bool ignore_array_bounds = synthetic_array_member;
- std::string child_name_str;
+ bool ignore_array_bounds = false;
+ std::string child_name;
uint32_t child_byte_size = 0;
int32_t child_byte_offset = 0;
uint32_t child_bitfield_bit_size = 0;
uint32_t child_bitfield_bit_offset = 0;
bool child_is_base_class = false;
bool child_is_deref_of_parent = false;
uint64_t language_flags;
-
- const bool transparent_pointers = !synthetic_array_member;
+ const bool transparent_pointers = true;
CompilerType compiler_type = m_impl_backend->GetCompilerType();
ExecutionContext exe_ctx(m_impl_backend->GetExecutionContextRef());
auto child_compiler_type_or_err = compiler_type.GetChildCompilerTypeAtIndex(
&exe_ctx, idx, transparent_pointers, omit_empty_base_classes,
- ignore_array_bounds, child_name_str, child_byte_size, child_byte_offset,
+ ignore_array_bounds, child_name, child_byte_size, child_byte_offset,
child_bitfield_bit_size, child_bitfield_bit_offset, child_is_base_class,
child_is_deref_of_parent, m_impl_backend, language_flags);
- CompilerType child_compiler_type;
- if (!child_compiler_type_or_err)
+
+ // One might think we should check that the size of the children
+ // is always strictly positive, hence we could avoid creating a
+ // ValueObject if that's not the case, but it turns out there
+ // are languages out there which allow zero-size types with
+ // children (e.g. Swift).
+ if (!child_compiler_type_or_err || !child_compiler_type_or_err->IsValid()) {
LLDB_LOG_ERROR(GetLog(LLDBLog::Types),
child_compiler_type_or_err.takeError(),
"could not find child: {0}");
- else
- child_compiler_type = *child_compiler_type_or_err;
+ return nullptr;
+ }
+ lldb::addr_t child_live_addr = LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
+ // Transfer the live address (with offset) to the child. But if
+ // the parent is a pointer, the live address is where that pointer
+ // value lives in memory, so the children live addresses aren't
+ // offsets from that value, they are just other load addresses that
+ // are recorded in the Value of the child ValueObjects.
+ if (m_live_address != LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS && !compiler_type.IsPointerType())
+ child_live_addr = m_live_address + child_byte_offset;
+
+ return new ValueObjectConstResultChild(
+ *m_impl_backend, *child_compiler_type_or_err, ConstString(child_name),
+ child_byte_size, child_byte_offset, child_bitfield_bit_size,
+ child_bitfield_bit_offset, child_is_base_class, child_is_deref_of_parent,
+ child_live_addr, language_flags);
+}
+
+ValueObject *
+ValueObjectConstResultImpl::CreateSyntheticArrayMember(size_t idx) {
+ if (m_impl_backend == nullptr)
+ return nullptr;
+
+ m_impl_backend->UpdateValueIfNeeded(false);
+
+ bool omit_empty_base_classes = true;
+ bool ignore_array_bounds = true;
+ std::string child_name;
+ uint32_t child_byte_size = 0;
+ int32_t child_byte_offset = 0;
+ uint32_t child_bitfield_bit_size = 0;
+ uint32_t child_bitfield_bit_offset = 0;
+ bool child_is_base_class = false;
+ bool child_is_deref_of_parent = false;
+ uint64_t language_flags;
+
+ const bool transparent_pointers = false;
+ CompilerType compiler_type = m_impl_backend->GetCompilerType();
+
+ ExecutionContext exe_ctx(m_impl_backend->GetExecutionContextRef());
+
+ auto child_compiler_type_or_err = compiler_type.GetChildCompilerTypeAtIndex(
+ &exe_ctx, 0, transparent_pointers, omit_empty_base_classes,
+ ignore_array_bounds, child_name, child_byte_size, child_byte_offset,
+ child_bitfield_bit_size, child_bitfield_bit_offset, child_is_base_class,
+ child_is_deref_of_parent, m_impl_backend, language_flags);
// One might think we should check that the size of the children
----------------
jimingham wrote:
Shouldn't this version of this comment be removed? It appears at line 76 in
your changed version.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94455
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
