Michael137 wrote: > > Should we allow such entries in the index? And does this warrant rephrasing > > in the DWARF spec? > > It's fine to have those as _nameless_ entries (which we don't emit today), > but the entries that are reaching "process entry" have a name by definition. > That if statement is a workaround for incorrect dwarf generation. It seems > like this test is providing a case where incorrect dwarf is generated?
Yea i misremembered, dsymutil is the one indexing these inline statics. @ZequanWu could you put up a PR for the proposed patch? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92328 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
