efriedma-quic wrote: > > The correct answer here is probably to fix the sizes in the RecordLayout > > itself; in particular, the DataSize of the members. > > That would be ideal, but also means we'd have to reflect the various C++ > attributes that affect layout in DWARF. Avoiding adding such > language-specific constructs to DWARF is what partly motivated this patch.
Given the offsets and sizes of the members of a struct, you can compute the datasize as the offset plus the size of the last member. That isn't really correct for POD structs, but the CGRecordLayout won't care: it can't tell the difference between padding that's illegal to reuse, vs. padding that the frontend chose not to reuse for some other reason. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93809 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
