felipepiovezan wrote:
> @felipepiovezan I have another question. For the same example. I see:
>
> ```
> Name 4 {
> Hash: 0x2F94396D
> String: 0x00000049 "_Z9get_statev"
> Entry @ 0x112 {
> Abbrev: 0x2
> Tag: DW_TAG_subprogram
> DW_IDX_die_offset: 0x00000023
> DW_IDX_parent: <parent not indexed>
> }
> ...
> Name 8 {
> Hash: 0x2B607
> String: 0x00000041 "B"
> Entry @ 0x13b {
> Abbrev: 0x7
> Tag: DW_TAG_namespace
> DW_IDX_type_unit: 0x00
> DW_IDX_die_offset: 0x00000025
> DW_IDX_parent: Entry @ 0x112
> }
> ```
>
> This seems like a bug no? Looks like it's confusing
>
> ```
> 0x00000023: DW_TAG_namespace
> DW_AT_name ("A")
> ```
>
> In TU 0 With Subprogram at the same (relative offset) in the CU
>
> ```
> 0x0000006a: Compile Unit: length = 0x0000005c, format = DWARF32, version =
> 0x0005, unit_type = DW_UT_compile, abbr_offset = 0x0000, addr_size = 0x08
> (next unit at 0x000000ca)
> ...
> 0x0000008d: DW_TAG_subprogram
> ```
>
> I think it should be pointing to:
>
> ```
> String: 0x00000023 "A"
> Entry @ 0x11e {
> Abbrev: 0x4
> Tag: DW_TAG_namespace
> DW_IDX_type_unit: 0x00
> DW_IDX_die_offset: 0x00000023
> DW_IDX_parent: <parent not indexed>
> }
> ```
You are right. The fact that they have the same relative offset tells me that
some part of the code is failing to account for TUs. I just checked the
printing code in the hope that it was a mistake while dumping, but it doesn't
seem to be...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91808
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
