https://github.com/JDevlieghere commented:
I'm in favor of this. I rarely have a meaningful error code and it makes the code needlessly verbose. I was going to ask if we wanted to make an overload of the existing `createStringError` but without the error code. But then I noticed that it uses the printf-style formatters (and not the llvm one). I think @bulbazord tried to add a `formatv` overload but that slowed down compilation of LLVM itself. Long story short, I think having this function take an `llvm::Twine` is fine. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93209 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
