================ @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ +//===-- SBAddressRange.h ----------------------------------------*- C++ -*-===// +// +// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. +// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. +// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception +// +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +#ifndef LLDB_API_SBADDRESSRANGE_H +#define LLDB_API_SBADDRESSRANGE_H + +#include "lldb/API/SBDefines.h" + +namespace lldb { + +class LLDB_API SBAddressRange { +public: + SBAddressRange(); + + SBAddressRange(const lldb::SBAddressRange &rhs); + + SBAddressRange(lldb::addr_t file_addr, lldb::addr_t byte_size); + + ~SBAddressRange(); + + const lldb::SBAddressRange &operator=(const lldb::SBAddressRange &rhs); + + void Clear(); + + bool IsValid() const; + + /// Get the base address of the range. + /// + /// \return + /// Base address object. + lldb::SBAddress GetBaseAddress() const; + + /// Get the byte size of this range. + /// + /// \return + /// The size in bytes of this address range. + lldb::addr_t GetByteSize() const; + +protected: + friend class SBAddressRangeList; + friend class SBBlock; + friend class SBFunction; + + lldb_private::AddressRange &ref(); + + const lldb_private::AddressRange &ref() const; + +private: + AddressRangeUP m_opaque_up; +}; + +#ifndef SWIG +bool LLDB_API operator==(const SBAddressRange &lhs, const SBAddressRange &rhs); +#endif ---------------- bulbazord wrote:
Yes, I would strongly prefer that. Freestanding operators are powerful and useful, but in my experience they cause headaches when trying to use them with tooling. (e.g. swift/C++ interop, clang-based tooling, etc.) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92014 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
