dwblaikie wrote: & FWIW, I think it is valid to include these declarations as entries, though not as named/index entries, per the spec:
> It is possible that an indexed debugging information entry has a parent that > is not indexed (for example, if its parent does not have a name attribute). > In such a case, a parent attribute may point to a nameless index entry (that > is, one that cannot be reached from any entry in the name table), or it may > point to the nearest ancestor that does have an index entry So I think you could have a parent that's a declaration, represented as a nameless index entry. That'd allow faster comparisons when examining the entry for the named child that had such a parent - because you could potentially check that named entry's fully qualified name directly from the named entry and the parents - without needing to parse all the DIEs in the CU to walk and find the start of the parents. But I don't believe clang is producing such DWARF today. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91808 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
