JDevlieghere wrote: > If this turns out to be necessary, one way to rate-limit them would be to > have a nesting depth counter. Assuming that these imports happen recursively > we could create only Progress objects for the top n layers.
Is the code that emits the progress event recursive too? The reason I ask is because on the command line, nested progress events will get shadowed. The same is true for coalesced progress events. I'm not sure how VSCode/DAP clients deal with this, so maybe they're shown there? Anyway, if the code is recursive, we might need to do something like we did for Swift, with one top-level event and callback that updates the details. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91452 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
