Michael137 wrote:

> @Michael137 I'm a little late to the party but I just noticed that 
> `ChildCacheState` is the only `enum class` in `lldb-enumerations.h`. Is that 
> intentional? Is there a reason this cannot be a old-school enum like 
> everything else in that file? I don't feel super strongly about I'd like to 
> make sure there's a reason for the inconsistency.

No particular reason apart from it being scoped, which I thought we might 
prefer for new enums. But there's no reason it couldn't be an old-school enum

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80167
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to