dwblaikie wrote: > For those files in the repository that do need CRLF endings, I've adopted a > policy of eol=crlf which means that git will store them in history with LF, > but regardless of user config, they'll be checked out in tree with CRLF.
This ^ seems a bit problematic to me, though (where the contents of the repo isn't representative of the bits we want - but perhaps it's schrodinger's line endings & it doesn't matter if it's always checked out as crlf - though if we one day converted to another source control system, would that be a problem? are there some things that examine the underlying/"real" repo contents?) - what would be the cost to using `eol=input` as you've done for the mixed line ending case? below \= > There also appears to be a single test, clang/test/Frontend/rewrite-includes-mixed-eol-crlf.[ch] which needs mixed line endings. This one uses eol=input to preserve it as-is. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86318 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
