================
@@ -914,6 +914,25 @@ def checkForkVForkSupport():
configuration.skip_categories.append("fork")
+def checkPexpectSupport():
+ from lldbsuite.test import lldbplatformutil
+
+ platform = lldbplatformutil.getPlatform()
+
+ # llvm.org/pr22274: need a pexpect replacement for windows
+ if platform in ["windows"]:
+ if configuration.verbose:
+ print("pexpect tests will be skipped because of unsupported
platform")
+ configuration.skip_categories.append("pexpect")
+ elif not configuration.shouldSkipBecauseOfCategories(["pexpect"]):
+ try:
+ import pexpect
+ except:
+ print(
+ "Warning: pexpect is not installed, but pexpect tests are not
being skipped."
----------------
rupprecht wrote:
For a pexpect test, it would fail either way, but raising an error here would
be more clear about the failure.
For a non-pexpect test, this will unnecessarily fail. `ninja check-lldb-api`
will have ~1k test failures instead of ~30 failures.
Updated to `raise` instead here.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84860
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
