jimingham wrote:
The way the current FormatEntity strings work, the first `%` says "formatter
coming next" then say `S` is "the kind of formatter" (in this case "return
summary instead of value". So in your case, like:
${var%%1x}
The "kind of formatter" is "%" which seems like a reasonable name for "printf
format string following". To be entirely strict, if the data following the
"kind" is the format string, this should be:
${var%%%1x}
but that's kind of silly. I think it's fine to say the format kind `%` means
`printf formatting string`, and then the data is everything after the % in a
printf formatting string.
If you didn't like the two percents, you could do this by having `p` be the
format kind that meant `printf formatting string` but I'm not sure that would
gain much.
This seems fine to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81196
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
