AaronBallman wrote: > Given the problem in [#77753 > (comment)](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77753#issuecomment-1912258038) > , @cor3ntin , @AaronBallman WDYT about adding new flags to `CXXRecordDecl`, > saying that constructor/destructor is not really `constexpr` before C++23?
Would it make sense to change `DefaultedDestructorIsConstexpr` so it's not a one-bit boolean value but is instead a 2-bit enumeration so we can have `Yes`, `No`, `NotUntilCpp23` as values for it? Then we're not adding related flags but keeping the logic in a single flag? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77753 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
