dcaballe wrote: Thanks for the info! I think making the interleave op at Vector level available to fixed vectors would also make sense. There is a point in knowing that a shuffle is actually implementing an interleave pattern.
I guess we should also be fine with this LLVM limitations for now: ``` While this intrinsic supports all vector types the recommended way to express this operation for fixed-width vectors is still to use a shufflevector, as that may allow for more optimization opportunities. ``` Again, if looks like we are building a small ad-hoc backend in here. Ultimately we may want this to be properly supported in LLVM. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79494 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
