kevinfrei wrote: > I'm wondering if shell test are really the best way to test this. For more > complex scenarios like are being tested here, we generally prefer [1] API > tests because they're more expressive and allow you to build more complicated > test binaries with our Makefile system. Things like stripping a binary and > generating split DWARF all seems like things that could be done that way, to > avoid checking in a (yaml-ized) binary. > > Did you consider/evaluate writing API tests for this? > > [1] https://lldb.llvm.org/resources/test.html
The next addition (async support) *requires* API tests, so I figured getting some shell tests in place to do a more "user experience" kind of testing was reasonable, since there will be API-based tests coming. If you feel like moving this stuff to API tests wholesale is the right thing to do, I'm happy to go figure that out next week. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79181 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
