================ @@ -9108,7 +9123,8 @@ bool Sema::CheckExplicitlyDefaultedComparison(Scope *S, FunctionDecl *FD, // declaration, it is implicitly considered to be constexpr. // FIXME: Only applying this to the first declaration seems problematic, as // simple reorderings can affect the meaning of the program. - if (First && !FD->isConstexpr() && Info.Constexpr) + if ((First && !FD->isConstexpr() && Info.Constexpr) || + getLangOpts().CPlusPlus23) ---------------- Fznamznon wrote:
> isn't Info.Constexpr always true in c++ mode? Hmm, then we probably don't need this change at all? > Haybe calling a comparison function of a class with a non-literal member from > a consteval function? Should the call to such function be allowed? I suppose not due to-literal member. The problem is, there result is same with our without this change. I meant to apply this: > CheckExplicitlyDefaultedComparison should alwways set the constexpr flag in > c++23 mode per > https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2448r2.html#pnum_39 Did I misunderstand? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77753 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
