Michael137 wrote: > The member is const with an initializer in-class. How is the constant value > not available for the definition?
Right, it is available, we just don't attach it if we have a location for it. Don't see why we couldn't put it on the definition if we have the constant on hand https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71780 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
