JDevlieghere wrote: Depends on #71456.
I considered an alternative where we don't store the `Checksum` in the `FileSpec` but create a new `SupportFile` class that wraps a `Checksum` and a `FileSpec`. The reason I didn't got with this approach is because of the `FileSpecList`. The latter has helper functions that are used in the context of "support files" which would have to duplicated in a `SupportFileList` and I wasn't sure we weren't vending a `FileSpecList` through the SB API that would now become a `SupportFileList`. A checksum is 16 bytes. Please let me know if you think that the overhead of that is too much and outweighs the churn and code duplication to adopt a `SupportFile` and `SupportFileList`. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71457 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
