Endilll wrote: @jimingham https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/d5444ab26743115e42e4abb3782bbefb0e8912d0/lldb/source/Symbol/CompilerDeclContext.cpp#L49-L61 and https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/d5444ab26743115e42e4abb3782bbefb0e8912d0/lldb/source/Plugins/TypeSystem/Clang/TypeSystemClang.cpp#L9697-L9712 suggest that depth of the search is type-system-dependent, and that Clang type system doesn't do recursive check, save for inline namespaces, which doesn't matter for this PR. I don't mind writing an interface for recursive search and saying somewhere that depths other that 1 are not yet supported, but I consider it outside of this PR (and my use case) to implement recursive search. Does this sound good to you, or you'd prefer something along the lines of `FindDirectNestedType`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68705 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
